Peer Review Policy

The African Journal of Applied Sciences and Humanities (AJASH) conducts a double-blind peer-review process by at least two independent experts. In this process, the reviewers do not know the authors' identities, and the authors do not know the reviewers' identities, ensuring an objective, fair, and transparent evaluation of all submitted research.

Key Aspects of Our Peer Review Process

The peer review process in the journal includes the following pillars:

Objective Evaluation Objective and rigorous evaluation of the manuscript's scholarly contribution.

Confidentiality Strict adherence to confidentiality and anonymity throughout the review.

Constructive Feedback Providing constructive feedback and timely communication with authors.

Editorial Independence Complete editorial independence in final publication decisions.

Disclosure and Ethics

All peer reviewers are required to immediately disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to report any unethical practices or scientific misconduct observed during the review process.